Disposed

Abdul Rasheed v. Mr.S.Najmudeen

Madras HC12 Mar 2018CONT P/2292/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court considered three Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against respondents for disobeying court orders. The court closed the petitions noting the respondents had already taken possession of the petition premises before the orders reached the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

All three Contempt Petitions are closed without any costs.

Abdul Rasheed Vs Mr.S.Najmudeen — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.03.2018

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶6

Contempt Petition Nos.2292 to 2294 of 2015 in C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.3242, 3462 and 3463 of 2015

¶7

Cont.P.No.2292 of 2015
Abdul Rasheed .. Petitioner
vs.
1.S.Najmudeen
2.S.Jabarullah Khan .. Respondents
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for
committing contempt of the order dated 24.08.2015 passed by
this Court in M.P.No.2 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.3462 of 2015.
Cont.P.No.2293 of 2015.
Dhanmull Jain .. Petitioner
vs.
1.S.Najmudeen
2.S.Jabarullah Khan
3.Ajmal Khan .. Respondents
(R3 impleaded as per the order dated
15.03.2016 in Sub-Appln.No.2293 of 2015)

¶8

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for committing contempt of the order dated 24.08.2015 passed by this Court in M.P.No.2 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.3463 of 2015. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

Cont.P.No.2294 of 2015

¶10

¶11

Rukmani .. Petitioner

¶12

vs. 1.S.Najmudeen 2.S.Jabarullah Khan 3.Ajmal Khan .. Respondents

¶13

(R3 impladed as per the order dated 15.03.2016 made in Sub-Appln.No.110 of 2016)

¶14

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for committing contempt of the order dated 10.08.2015 passed by this Court in M.P.No.2 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.3242 of 2015. In all the three Cont.Petitions For Petitioners :Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondents :Mr.M.Aravind Subramaniam O R D E R

¶15

These Contempt Petitions are filed to punish the respondents for having committed contempt of Court for disobeying the order dated 24.08.2015 passed by this Court in M.P.Nos.2 and 2 of 2015 in C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.3462 and 3463 of 2015 and order dated 10.08.2015 passed by this Court in M.P.No.2 of 2015 in C.R.P.No.3242 of 2015.

¶16

2.In view of the fact that the respondents in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.3242, 3462 and 3463 of 2015 have taken

¶17

possession of the petition premises before the order of this Court reached the petitioners, all the Contempt Petitions are closed. No costs.

¶18

SD/ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶19

¶20

Dated at Madras this the day of 2018.

¶21

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶22

from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. KR/CO/02/04/2018

¶23

one cc to M/s. M. Aravind Subramaniam,SR.No.4072. One cc to M. Aravind subramaniam,SR,No.4073. One cc to M. Aravind subramnaiam,SR,no. 4074.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Abdul Rasheed v. Mr.S.Najmudeen

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Rasheed v. Mr.S.Najmudeen

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Deivasigamani Vs a.Jayapaul

M/S Chnadammal Vs Jagadishbhai Bhatt(Died)

Pappammal (Died) Vs S.Gokulan

V.Rajkumar (Died) Vs M/S R.v.Gurusamy Naidu

Ramalingam S/O Kaliyaperumal Vs Mangalalakshmi

N.Mahendran Vs v.P.Thangavel (Deceased)