S.Alagarsamy v. Mr.Govindaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
In this single-page order, the Court noted that the respondent had registered the FIR pursuant to a previous order. After recording that the petitioner’s counsel substantiated compliance, the Commissioner of Contempt Petitions closed the petition without imposing any punishment.
What did the court decide?
The petition was closed by recording satisfaction that the respondent had registered the FIR.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
CONT P.No. 2263 of 2017
S.Alagarsamy
...Petitioner
Vs
Govindaraj Inspector of Police, Guduvancherry Police Station, Guduvancherry, Kancheepuram District.
...Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt Act praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of order dated 15.09.2017 of this Court made in Crl.OP. No. 19378 of 2017.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of a court order dated 15.09.2017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Alagarsamy
- respondent
Govindaraj
Coram
M.S. Ramesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court