S.Palayam v. K.Rajkuamar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition, the court accepted that the respondent had complied with the earlier order by surveying the property. The petition was closed with no costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed with no costs awarded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.11.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Contempt Petition No.2172 of 2018
S.Palayam ... Petitioner
Vs.
K.Rajkumar,
Thasildar,
Tirupporur Taluk,
Taluk Office, Thirupporur. ... Respondent
Prayer: The contempt petition filed under section 11 of contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent herein under the provision of the Contempt of Court's Act for willful disobedience of the orders of this Court dated 10.05.2017 in W.P.No.12387 of 2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narendran For Respondent : Mr.K.S.Suresh Government Advocate
.........
O R D E R
This petition is filed seeking to punish the respondent for committing contempt of Court by disobeying the order dated 10.05.2017 in W.P.No.12387 of 2017.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for punishment for willful disobedience court orders should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Palayam
- respondent
K.Rajkumar
Coram
K.Kalynasundaram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court