Contempt appeal filed against a common order. The appellate court found that the main contempt petition was infructuous. Consequently, the court closed the contempt appeal without any specific ruling or order to serve.
The contempt appeal was closed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
CONTEMPT APPEAL No.6 of 2017
Vs.
1. Henry Prem Anand
2. N. Rajesh
Assistant Engineer,
TANGEDCO,
Kilpauk, Chennai.
3. D. Venkatesan,
Assistant Executive Engineer,
TANGEDCO,
Kilpauk, Chennai. ..Respondents
Prayer: Contempt Appeal to set aside the common order dated 04.09.2017 passed in Sub Application (OS) 249 & 250 of 2017 in Contempt Petition 1038 of 2017 in C.R.P.(PD) No. 446 of 2017.
Sub.Appln.(OS) No.249 of 2017:-
Sub Application filed under section 151 of CPC praying this court be pleased to order directing the Assistant Commissioner of Police attached to G1 Vepery Police Station, Chennai 600 007 to provide police prodection for the purpose of executing the court order passed in CRP(PD)No.446 of 2017.
Sub.Appln.(OS) No.250 of 2017:-
Sub Application filed under section 151 of CPC praying this court be pleased to pass an order of break open the locks of the suit premises in case if the premises is under lock and key condition in order to execute the court passed in CRP(PD)No.446 of 2017.
Cont.P.No.1038 of 2017:-
Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt Courts Act, 1971 praying that this Court be pleased to punish Respondents for wilful violation of the order dated 26.04.2017 passed be this Hon'ble Court in CRP(PD)No.446 of 2017.
For Appellant :: Mr.Lakshmi Narayanan for Mr.R. Lakshmi Narasimhan
For Respondents :: Mr.S.S. Rajesh for R1
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. SUBBIAH,J.)
When the contempt appeal is taken up, it is submitted
by the learned counsel for the appellant that nothing survives
in the contempt appeal and that the same may be closed as
infructuous. An endorsement to that effect has also been made by
the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made,
the contempt appeal is closed as infructuous.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nv
To
1. The IV Assistant Judge,
City Civil Court, Chennai
+2ccs to Mr.S.S.Rajesh , Advocate, S.R.No.7769
+2ccs to Mr.R.Lakshmi Narasimhan, Advocate, S.R.No.7785
Cont. Appeal No.6 of 2017
NRK(CO) CS/16/02/18
K. Nirmala
M. Madhu Prakash
Henry Prem Anand
N. Rajesh
D. Venkatesan
R. SUBBIAH
P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
