In a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act filed against the Director of Elementary Education Deprtment, the Court accepted submission that the impugned order dated 21.09.2017 was complied with, and thus closed the petition without costs.
The contempt petition stands closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.10.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.2007 of 2018
T.Ramalingam ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.A.Karuppusamy, The Director, Elementary Education Department, College Road, Chennai 600 006. ... Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for deliberately and willfully to disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court made in W.P.No.9642/2015 dated 21.09.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sairaman
For Respondent : Mr.K.Kathikeyan Government Advocate
O R D E R
The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf
of the respondent made a submission that the order passed
by this Court in W.P.No.9642 of 2015 dated 21.09.2017 has
been complied with. In this regard the Director of
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Elementary Education, Chennai passed an order in
proceedings dated 28.09.2018.
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent has complied with the order dated 21.09.2017 made in W.P.No.9642/2015.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
T.Ramalingam
Mr.A.Karuppusamy, The Director, Elementary Education Department, College Road, Chennai 600 006
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
