Contempt petition closed in response to Government proving compliance with a prior court order via a G.O., necessitating no further action.
Contempt petition closed with no further orders necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.04.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
CONT. P.No.2003 of 2017
K.Asaithambi .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Dr.C.Sureshkumar, I.A.S.,
District Collector,
Nagapattinam District,
Collectorate,
Nagapattinam.
2.Mr.K.Pitchai Mohideen, M.Sc.,
Personal Assistant to District
Collector (Development),
Collectorate, Nagapattinam District. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt Act
to punish the respondents herein for their willful disobedience of the
order of this Court dated 06.07.2017 in W.P.No.25327 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr. S.Mani
For Respondents : Mr.M.Elumalai
Govt. Advocate
ORDER
It is represented by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that a direction passed by this Court in W.P.No.25327 of 2014, dated 06.07.2017, has been complied with and http://www.judis.nic.in
2
V.PARTHIBAN.J,
kal
to that effect, the proceedings of the respondents in G.O.(3g) No.22,
dated 04.04.2018, has been produced before this Court.
further orders are necessary in this Contempt Petition and therefore,
the same is closed.
04.04.2018
Index:Yes/No
Internet:Yes/No
kal
To
1.Dr.C.Sureshkumar, I.A.S.,
District Collector,
Nagapattinam District,
Collectorate,
Nagapattinam.
2.Mr.K.Pitchai Mohideen, M.Sc.,
Personal Assistant to District
Collector (Development),
Collectorate, Nagapattinam District.
CONT. P.No.2003 of 2018
K.Asaithambi
Dr.C.Sureshkumar
Mr.K.Pitchai Mohideen
V.Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
