Kanthammal @ Muniyammal v. Mrs.Sundaravalli
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the petitioner sought punishment for wilful disobedience of an earlier order. The court allowed the petition to be closed after recording that the petitioners had received the requisite fees and that encroachments had been removed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition is closed as the order under contempt had been complied with.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.12.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Contempt Petition No.1667 of 2018
Kanthammal @ Muniyammal ... Petitioner
vs.
1. Sundaravalli
District Collector,
Tiruvallur District,
Tiruvallur.
2. S.S.Kumar
Project Officer,
District Rural Development Agency,
Poondi Panchayat Union,
Collectorate, Tiruvallur.
...Respondents
Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts
Act, 1971, praying to punish the Respondent for wilfully
disobeying the order dated 25.06.2018 passed by this Court
in Contempt Petition No.717 of 2018 in W.P.No.14486 of 2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.J.Purushothaman, Government Advocate
O R D E R
This Contempt Petition is filed seeking to punish the Respondents for wilfully disobeying the order dated
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents had wilfully disobeyed the order dated 25.06.2018 in the prior contempt proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kanthammal @ Muniyammal
- respondent
Sundaravalli
- respondent
S.S.Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court