K.Senthamaraikannan v. S.Basker
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the court closed the petition and dispensed with the personal appearance of the respondent's CEO upon payment of arrears and tender of an unconditional apology.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; personal appearance of the Chief Executive Officer dispensed with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.07.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No. 1591 of 2018
K.Senthamaraikannan ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.S.Basker The Managing Trustee Now Regional Director-Operations M/s.Arupadi Veedu Medical College & Hospital Kirumambakkam, Puducherry- 607 402 ... Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Section-11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971 to Punish the respondent for willfully disobeying the order and direction issued by this Court dated 25.03.2014 made in M.P.No.2 of 2011 in W.P.No.10306 of 2011.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Ramesh
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt petition is maintainable when the contemner has tendered an unconditional apology and paid the arrears.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Senthamaraikannan
- respondent
Mr.S.Basker
Coram
T.S.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court