M.R. Saravanan v. A.K. Viswanathan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt Act for non-compliance with an order dated 23.08.2017, the Court heard the respondent's submission that compliance had been effected. The Court recorded these submissions and closed the petition without further ado.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.06.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
CONT P.No. 1390 of 2018
M.R.Saravanan
...Petitioner
Vs
1.A.K.Viswanathan The Commissioner of Police, E.V.K.Sampath Salai, Vepery, Chennai.
- Anbu The Joint Commissioner of Police, St.Thomas Mount,
Parangimalai, Chennai.
- Muthuswamy,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of given the Government Advocate's submission that the impugned order of 23.08.2017 has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.R. Saravanan
- respondent
A.K. Viswanathan
- respondent
Anbu
- respondent
Muthuswamy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court