S. Pushpavathy, v. Mr. Hans Raj Verma, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this order, the learned Government Advocate submitted that a recent order by the petitioner has been complied with, rendering further adjudication unnecessary. The court closed the contempt petition without granting costs.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2018
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Contempt Petition No.1286 of 2018
S.Pushpavathy ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. Mr.Hans Raj Verma, I.A.S.,
Secretary to Government,
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department,
State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9.
2. K.Baskaran, I.A.S., Director,
Commissioner of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj,
Panagal Building, Chennai – 15.
3. Mr.P.Ponniah, I.A.S.,
District Collector,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
...Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein severely for wilfully disobeying the directions issued by this Hon'ble Court on 26.07.2017 in W.P.No.16331 of 2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Rajasekaran
For Respondents: Mr.M.Elumalai, GA
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Pushpavathy
- respondent
Mr.Hans Raj Verma
- respondent
K.Baskaran
- respondent
Mr.P.Ponniah
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court