C.Velayudham v. Mrs. K. Nalina
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioner sought punishment for the respondent's alleged wilful disobedience of a court order. The respondent submitted that the direction was complied with and produced a letter as proof. The court accepted this and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed; no punishment awarded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 6.7.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA
Contempt Petition No.1255 of 2018
C.Velayudham ... Petitioner
versus
K.Nalina
Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies,
Tindivanam Circle,
Tindivanam,
Villupuram District. ... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt
of Courts Act to punish the respondent for wilfully
disobeying the orders of the court dated 11.1.2018 in
W.P.No.615 of 2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Spl.G.P. ******
O R D E R The learned Govt. Advocate submitted that the direction given by this Court has been duly complied with by the respondent and he also produced a copy of the letter addressed to the petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed after the respondent shows compliance with the court direction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Velayudham
- respondent
K.Nalina
Coram
T.Raja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court