Henry Prem Anand v. K.Nirmala
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court dismissed a Contempt Petition filed for wilful violation of an order directing water supply. The Advocate Commissioner reported the pipeline was laid as per agreed terms. The Court closed the contempt petition while granting limited access to the terrace for tank cleaning.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed. Petitioner permitted terrace access once monthly. Parties directed to pay Rs.5,000 each to Commissioner and dispose of underlying OS suit expeditiously on or before 31.08.201
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.03.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI
Contempt Petition No.1038 of 2017
in C.R.P(PD).No.446 of 2017
Henry Prem Anand .. Petitioner
Vs.
1.K.Nirmala
2.M.Madhuprakash
3.N.Rajesh
4.D.Venkatesan .. Respondents
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for
wilful violation of the order dated 26.04.2017 passed by
this Court in C.R.P(PD).No.446 of 2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Rajesh
For R1 : Mr.R.Lakshmi Narasimhan
For R2 : M.M.Madhu Prakash,
Party-in-person
For R3 & R4 : No appearance
Advocate
Commissioner : Mr.C.Senapathi
O R D E R
By the order dated 27.02.2018, Mr.C.Senapathi, Advocate was appointed as Commissioner to inspect the suit property
2
and file a report suggesting the best way to give water
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents committed contempt by wilful violation of the Court's order dated 26.04.2017 regarding water supply to the petitioner
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Henry Prem Anand
- respondent
K.Nirmala
- respondent
M.Madhuprakash
- respondent
N.Rajesh
- respondent
D.Venkatesan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court