R. Rangasamy v. Kasthuri
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal dismissed as not pressed. Appellant's counsel submitted that parties are living together and the appellant is no longer interested in proceeding.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.10.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
CMSA.No.33 of 2008
R.Rangasamy ... Appellant Versus Kasthuri ... Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Section 28 Hindu Marriage Act, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 19.11.2007 in C.M.A.No.12 of 2007 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.2) Gobichettipalayam in reversing the fair and final order dated 15.02.2006 in H.M.O.P.No.66 of 2003 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam. For Appellant : Mr.S.Kaithaimalaikumaran For Respondent : Mr.V.Ayyadurai J U D G M E N T The appellant has filed the Civil miscellaneous second appeal as against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.11.2007 in C.M.A.No.12 of 2007 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.2) Gobichettipalayam in reversing the fair and final order dated 15.02.2006 in H.M.O.P.No.66 of 2003 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam.
- When the matter is listed today, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the appellant and the respondent are living together and the appellant is not interested to proceed the appeal. Hence, he seeks permission of this Court to dismiss this appeal as not pressed and he has also made an endorsement to the effect.
“The Appellant and the respondent are living together and the appellant is not interested in proceeding the appeal further. Hence, the CMSA.No.33
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.Rangasamy
- respondent
Kasthuri
Coram
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court