Disposed

Muthammal, v. Rajasekaran

Madras HC6 Jul 2018CMP(MD)/7074/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, through Justice J. Nisha Banu, considered a petition regarding the condonation of a 154-day delay in filing a civil miscellaneous appeal in a motor accident claim matter. The court inclined to allow the delay subject to payment of ₹500 as cost to the Chief Justice Relief Fund.

What did the court decide?

Delay condoned subject to payment of ₹500 to the Chief Justice Relief Fund within one week.

Muthammal, Vs Rajasekaran — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶6

CMP(MD) No.7074 of 2017 IN CMA(MD) No.SR19662 of 2017

¶7

1 MUTHAMMAL

¶8

2 NANDHINI

¶9

3 CHELLAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶10

¶11

1 RAJASEKARAN

¶12

2 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER,

¶13

NO.1, POST OFFICE ROAD,

¶14

PALAYAMKOTTAI. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 154 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and thus render justice.

¶16

PRAYER IN CMA(MD) No.SR19662 of 2017:

¶17

To allow this appeal and enhance the award amount in M.C.O.P.No.461 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,(1^st Additional District Court) Tirunelveli, dated 09.06.2016.

¶18

ORDER :This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.T.SELVAKUMARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.C.JAWAHAR RAVINDRAN, Advocate on behalf of the 2^nd Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶19

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 154 days in filing the civil miscellaneous appeal in C.M.A.(MD) No.SR19662 of 2017, against the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.461 of 2014.

¶20

Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ support of the petition and also considering the length of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay, subject to the payment

¶21

¶22

of cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically, without any further reference to this Court.

¶23

This petition is accordingly ordered.

¶24

sd/06/07/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, (1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE), TIRUNELVELI

¶28

COPY TO : THE SECTION OFFICER, ACCOUNT SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶29

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.7074 of 2017 IN CMA(MD) No.SR19662 of 2017 Date :06/07/2018 PK/RR/VK/11.07.2018 : 2P/3C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Muthammal, v. Rajasekaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthammal, v. Rajasekaran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Seyadu Sulaiman, Vs Kannan

The Managing Director Vs Nargis Nirmala Devi

The Managing Director Vs Christina Philomina

The Regional Manager, Vs Arun,S/O.Deva Sathianathan

The Divisional Manager, Vs Gunasekaran

Rajalakshmi, Vs Balasubramanian