Allowed

Rajan S/O.K.Subramaniyan v. Sarala Devi

Madras HC23 Jul 2018CMP(MD)/6639/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court condoned a delay of 338 days in condoning delay for filing a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal regarding the setting aside of a family settlement decree, subject to payment of costs to the Chief Justice Relief Fund.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay of 338 days subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 to the Chief Justice Relief Fund within one week.

Rajan S/O.K.Subramaniyan Vs Sarala Devi — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twenty Third day of July Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶6

CMP(MD) No.6639 of 2018 IN

¶7

CMA(MD) No.SR19740 of 2017

¶8

RAJAN ... APPELLANT / PETITIONER

1 SARALA DEVI

2 AMUTHA

3 SETHURAMAN ... RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 338 days in representing the CMA SR.No.19740 of 2017 and thus render justice.

¶14

PRAYER IN CMA(MD) No.SR19740 of 2017:-

¶15

to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 04.10.2016 made in G.W.O.P.No.11 of 2011 before the Principal District Court, Viruthunagar District at Srivilliputhur

¶16

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MRS.A.BANUMATHY, Advocate for the petitioner and the court made the following order:-

¶17

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 338 days in representing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

¶18

2.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and also considering the length of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay subject to the payment of cost of Rs.1,000/-(Rupees one thousand only) to the Chief Justice Relief Fund within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶19

3.This petition is accordingly ordered.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

In the event of payment of cost, the Registry is directed to

¶22

¶23

number the appeal, if it is in order and list the same “for admission” forthwith.

¶24

sd/23/07/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶26

Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

¶28

THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT COPY TO:-

¶29

1 THE SECTION OFFICER, ACCOUNTS SECTION, CHIEF JUSTICE RELIEF FUND, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2 THE SUB-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, A.E. SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI GCG JAM/26/07/2018/VR /SAR 3/ 2P-4C ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.6639 of 2018 IN CMA(MD) No.SR19740 of 2017 Date :23/07/2018

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rajan S/O.K.Subramaniyan v. Sarala Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajan S/O.K.Subramaniyan v. Sarala Devi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Branch Manager Vs Muniyandi

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs U.Parameswari

Poomathi Vs Mangudi (Died)

Arumuga Nadar, Vs Tuticorin Salt & Marine

Natarajan, Vs Jayakumar

M.Karuthapandi Vs the Divisional Manager