Partly allowed

P.a.K.Manoharan, v. Kumarasamy Gounder (Dead)

Madras HC14 Mar 2018CMP(MD)/11769/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madra High Court bench of Just J.Nisha Banu considered a petition to condone an 181-day delay in filing a civil revision petition. The court allowed the condonation subject to payment of costs.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 181 days in representing the Civil Revision Petition is condoned upon payment of Rs. 1,000/- costs to the Legal Aid Service Authority within three days.

P.a.K.Manoharan, Vs Kumarasamy Gounder (Dead) — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶5

CMP(MD) No.11769 of 2017 IN CRP(MD) No.SR19518 of 2017

¶6

P.A.K.MANOHARAN ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER

¶7

KUMARASAMY GOUNDER (DEAD)

¶8

1.BALAKRISHNAN VEERAKUMAR (DEAD)

¶9

2 PAPPAL

¶10

3 PACKIALAKSHMI

¶11

4 CHITHRADEVI

¶12

5 RANI

¶13

6 DEEPA

¶14

7 INDIRANI ... RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order condoning the delay of 181 days incurred in representing CRP.SR.No.19518/2017 filed against order dated 01/09/2016 passed in IA.No.160/2016 in IA.No.192/2008 in OS.No.224/2004 by Principal District Court, Dindigul on such terms as it deems fit.

¶16

PRAYER IN CRP(MD) No.SR19518 of 2017:-

¶17

to pass an order setting aside the order dated 01.09.2016 passed in I.A.No.160/2015 in I.A.No.192/2008 in O.S.No.224/2004 by Principal District Court, Dindigul.

¶18

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.ANAND CHANDRASEKAR, Advocate of M/S.SARVABHAUMAN ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the petitioner and the court made the following order:-

¶19

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 181 days in representing the civil revision petition in C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.19518 of 2017.

¶20

Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ support of the petition and also considering the length of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay, subject to the payment

¶21

of cost of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) to the Legal Aid Service Authority, attached to this Bench, within a period of three days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, this petition shall stand dismissed automatically, without any further reference to this Court.

¶22

This petition is accordingly ordered.

¶23

sd/14/03/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶25

THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, DINDIGUL

¶26

COPY TO:-

¶27

THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, LEGAL AID SERVICES AUTHORITY, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶28

gk JAM/16/03/2018/ CM-VR / SAR 3/ 2p-3c ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.11769 of 2017 IN CRP(MD) No.SR19518 of 2017 Date :14/03/2018

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.a.K.Manoharan, v. Kumarasamy Gounder (Dead)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.a.K.Manoharan, v. Kumarasamy Gounder (Dead)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radha Krishnammal, Vs a.Vasudevan

Sridevi Vs S. Rajalingam

Manimegalai Vs B. Venkateshwaran

A.S.Dhanasamy, Madhakovil St, Vs R.Sivakumar

P.Deepan Subahar, Vs P.Kamuthayee

Subbulakshmi Vs Senthilvel