Dismissed

Iffco Tokyo General Insurance v. S.Michael Anitus

Madras HC27 Jul 2018CMA(MD)/831/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the insurance appeal filed by Iffco Tokyo General Insurance Company against the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award when counsel represented the award amount had already been deposited with the Tribunal.

What did the court decide?

The Tribunal award dated 04.02.2014 in M.C.O.P.No.13 of 2012 is confirmed and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. The first respondent is directed to withdraw the awarded amount with accrued

Iffco Tokyo General Insurance Vs S.Michael Anitus — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Friday, the Twenty Seventh day of July, Two Thousand and Eighteen present THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

¶4

C.M.A(MD).No.831 of 2014

¶5

Iffco Tokyo General Insurance Company Limited, rep. by its Branch Manager, Kalluveetil, No.82, 3^rd Floor Court Road, Nagercoil, Tamil Nadu. ... Appellant/ 3^rd respondent Vs. 1.S.Michael Anitus ... 1^st respondent / Petitioner / Claimant 2.S.Nagarajan 2.S.Manickavasagam ... Respondents 2 & 3/ Respondents 1 & 2

¶6

Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Judge,Motor Accidents claims Tribunal/ Nagercoil, dated 04.2.2014 made in M.C.O.P.No.13 of 2012.

¶7

ORDER: This Appeal coming on for hearing on this day; upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the award of the Tribunal, and the material papers available to this case, and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan, Advocate for the Appellant, Mr.I.Robert Chandrasekar, Advocate for the first Respondent and of Mr.R.Murugan, Advocate for the Respondents 2 and 3 and this Court have observed that it is represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that the entire award amount has already been deposited , this Court doth order and decree as follows:

¶8

(i)That the award dated 04.02.2014 made in MCOP No.13 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Principal Subordinate Court), Nagercoil be and hereby is confirmed and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed;

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (ii)That the first respondent/Claimant shall withdraw the award amount with accrued interests and costs less the amount already withdrawn by him, if any by filing a petition before the Tribunal.

¶10

¶11

(iii)And that there be no costs in this Appeal. Sd/ Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶12

/True copy/

¶13

Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶14

¶15

The Principal Subordinate Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

¶16

Copy to: The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.(2 COPIES)

¶17

+1cc to Mr.R.MURUGAN, Advocate, SR.No.75449 +1cc to Mr.I.ROBERT CHANDRAKUMAR, Advocate, SR.No. 75820 +1cc to Mr.S.SRINIVASARAGHAVAN, Advocate, SR.No.75568

¶18

DATED:27.07.2018 DECREE C.M.A(MD).No.831 of 2014

¶19

NATURE OF THE DECREE: Dismissing the Appeal preferred against the Judgment /Decree dated 4.2.14 in MCOP No.13/12 on the file of the MACT/ Principal Sub court, Nagercoil and giving directions ect as stated therein.

¶20

KK/TE/RP/14.08.2018/SAR-3/2P-7C

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Iffco Tokyo General Insurance v. S.Michael Anitus

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Iffco Tokyo General Insurance v. S.Michael Anitus

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramalakshmi, Vs Thangaraj

Sri Vinayaka Hardwares and Vs P.Pandi @ Karuppasamy

Cholamandalam Ms General Ins. Vs Muthan

The Branch Manager, Vs Mariammal, W/O.Late.

Divisional Manager, M/S.Royal Vs Manalakshmi

K.Muthu Irulayee, Vs M.Chinnapandi