Muthal v. K.Periyanan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a motor accident claim appeal, the High Court enhanced compensation from Rs.1,40,000 to Rs.9,57,200. The court set aside the Tribunal's finding that the insurer was exempted due to an alleged lack of a valid driving license, noting that the driver actually possessed a valid one.
What did the court decide?
Compensation enhanced to Rs.9,57,200 with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:19.07.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN
C.M.A.No.531 of 2017
and CMP.No.11203 of 2017
1.Muthal 2.Manian ..Appellants/Petitioners Vs 1.K.Periyanan 2.A.Karuppannan 3.The Branch Manager National Insurance Company Ltd., Branch No.133, Promernand Road Branch Cantonment, Trichy ..Respondents/REspondents
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the order and decree dated 27.04.2010 made in M.C.O.P.No.897 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Court, Erode.
For appellants : : Mr.T.M.Karthikeyan For Respondents : : Mr.C.S.Saravanan for R1 and R2 Ms.N.B.Surekha for R3.
J U D G M E N T
The Appellants are the Petitioners and fled the above appeal challenging the order and decree dated 27.04.2010 made in M.C.O.P.No.897 of 2005 respectively on the file of Principal District Court, Erode.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the finding of the Tribunal exonerating the insurer due to alleged violation of policy conditions regarding the driver's license can be set aside when evidence shows the license was valid.
Whether the compensation awarded for the death of a minor student was adequate and required enhancement.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Muthal
- appellant
Manian
- respondent
K.Periyanan
- respondent
A.Karuppannan
- respondent
The Branch Manager National Insurance Company Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court