Allowed

Saraswathi v. the Correspondent

Madras HC8 Sept 2018CMA/2372/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a National Lok Adalat award where parties settled a motor accident claim appeal. The Insurance Company agreed to deposit an enhanced amount over the Tribunal award. The Tribunal was directed to credit the enhanced amount to the claimants and dispose of the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Insurance Company to deposit enhanced award of Rs. 1,40,000- over the Tribunal award within six weeks; appellants to withdraw enhanced amount equally; appeal disposed of; Tribunal to credit amount to

Saraswathi Vs the Correspondent — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI

¶3

National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 8^th September, 2018

¶4

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶5

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶6

Presided over by:- The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶7

Members:- (1) Mr. N.Sambasivam, District Judge (Retd.)
(2) Mrs.R.Rathna Thara
C.M.A.No. 2372 of 2017
(Appeal against the Judgment and decree dated 30.10.2006 made in
MCOP.No.113 of 2004 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief
Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dharmapuri District at Krishnagiri).
1. Saraswathi
2. Loganthan ...Appellants
Vs.
1. The Correspondent
Sri Sathya Sai Metric Schoo,
Kundarapalli Village,
Ramapuram Post,
Krishnagiri Taluk,
Dharmapuri District.
2. The Branch Manager,
National Insurance Company Ltd.,
Branch Office, Anuradha Complex,
Third Floor, Bangalore Road,
Krishnagiri -1. ..Respondents

¶8

Though the case is not listed today, it is taken up for settlement at the instance of both the parties. The learned counsel for the appellants, Mr.V.Kumaravelan is present. The learned counsel for the second respondent Insurance Company Mrs.N.B.Surekha is present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶10

¶11

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶12

Both the parties and their respective counsels are present.

¶13

2.The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 1,58,200/- with interest at 7.5%

¶14

p.a. from the date of petition till the date of deposit as compensation.

¶15

3.Aggrieved by the award of the tribunal, the Appellants/claimants have preferred the present appeal.

¶16

4.It is submitted by the Insurance Company that the entire award amount has been deposited by the Insurance Company. Now both the parties are agreed to settle the matter and as per the settlement, over and above the award amount, a sum of Rs.1,40,000/- (Rupees one Lakh fourth Thousand Only) shall be deposited by the Insurance company with interest and cost. The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the enhanced award amount within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶17

On such deposit the appellants are entitled to withdraw a enhanced award amount equally between them. Award is passed accordingly.

¶18

The Tribunal is directed to disburse the award amount to the claimants'

¶19

Savings Bank Account, through RTGS/NEFT, on proper identification of the account of the claimants in accordance with the terms of the award, without insisting on any formal permission petition. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶20

¶21

disposed of accordingly. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition, if

¶22

any, is closed.

¶23

1. Sarashwathi

¶24

Loganthan Counsel for Appellants
National Insurance Company Ltd.,
Branch Office, Anuradha Complex,
Third Floor, Bangalore Road,
Krishnagiri -1.
Counsel for 2nd Respondent
This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.
The Court fee paid shall be refunded to the parties in the manner

¶25

provided under the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶26

Judge Member Member

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

M.S.RAMESH

rts

The parties/Counsel concerned

¶33

Copy to

¶34

1.The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dharmapuri District at Krishnagiri

¶35

2.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.

¶36

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

¶37

4.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.

¶38

C.M.A.No.2372 of 2017

¶39

08.09.2018

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

Saraswathi v. the Correspondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saraswathi v. the Correspondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Shahabudeen Vs Mr.Krishan Kumar

R.K.Ganesan Vs Kavitha

R.Karthikeyan Vs Dr.M.Saikumar IAS

V.Venkatesan, M/61 Yrs Vs Mr.S.Sudhakar

A.Inayathullah Vs Zulaikha Begum Died

K.Palani Vs Krishnaveni