Asha Jain v. Suresh M.Jain
Case brief
What is this about?
On non-prosecution for want of representation by the appellant, the Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and closed the connected Miscellaneous Petition.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE JUDICATE OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 08.02.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
C.M.A.No.2369 of 2013
and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
Asha Jain ... Appellant/Respondent
Vs.
Suresh M.Jain ... Respondent/Petitioner
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Section 19
of the Family Courts Act 1984, as against the judgment and
decree dated 05.02.2013 in O.P.No.2733 of 2014 passed by the
Principal Judge, Family Court at Chennai.
For Appellant : No appearance
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBBIAH, J.,)
When the matter was called on 07.02.2018, there was no representation for the appellant, hence the mattr was directed to be posted today under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
2.Even today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation of the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Asha Jain
- respondent
Suresh M. Jain
Coram
R Subbiah
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court