P.Devaraj v. Manimala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an appeal against a Family Court decree denying divorce. Confirming the lower court's finding that the separation was temporary as parties reside under one roof, the appeal was rejected due to lack of evidence substantiating cruelty.
What did the court decide?
No. Costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05-03-2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2235 of 2012
P.Devaraj .. Appellant/Petitioner Versus Manimala .. Respondent/Respondent Appeal filed under Section 19 of The Family Court Act against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.04.2004 passed in HMOP No. 497 of 2001 on the file of Family Court, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr. V. Nicholas For Respondent : Mrs. S.S. Jothivani JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. Subbiah, J)
This appeal is filed by the appellant/husband questioning the correctness and/or validity of the Judgment and Decree dated 15.04.2004 passed in HMOP No. 497 of 2001 on the file of Family Court, Coimbatore. By the said Judgment, the Family Court refused to grant a decree of divorce and dismissed the Original Petition filed by the appellant.
- It is the case of the appellant that he married the respondent on 24.01.1988 as per Hindu rites and customs and the marriage was solemnised at Kandasamy Chettiar Kalyana Mandapam, Oppanakara Street, Coimbatore in the presence of relatives of both sides. After marriage, the appellant and the respondent commenced their matrimonial journey in the house of the appellant. Due to the wedlock, a male and female child were born to them. It is stated that the appellant is working as a Car mechanic in a workshop called Coimbatore Automobiles and looked after the respondent and the children well. However, the respondent, even for trivial reasons, behaved rudely and indifferently towards the appellant which led to frequent quarrel. It is his case that the respondent did not respect his
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the long separation between the spouses warrants a decree of divorce.
Whether the Family Court erred in finding that the separation was temporary given the parties reside under the same roof.
Whether the appellant failed to substantiate allegations of cruelty and poison consumption with documentary evidence.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.Devaraj
- respondent
Manimala
Coram
R. Subbiah
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court