Senguttuvan v. Bharathi
Case brief
What is this about?
In matrimonial dispute where parties lived together with sons after agreed reconciliation, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by mutual consent, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 16.07.2018
Coram
The Honourable Mr. Justice S.BASKARAN
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1247 of 2017
and
C.M.P.Nos.6367 and 6368 of 2017
Senguttuvan ... Appellant/Petitioner
..vs. Bharathi ... Respondent/Respondent
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has filed under Section 47 of Guardian and Ward Act,1890 to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 25.10.2016 in GWOP.No.41 of 2013 passed by the learned District Judge, Nagapattinam.
For Appellant : Mr.P.Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.S.M.Muralidharan
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Senguttuvan
- respondent
Bharathi
Coram
S.BASKARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court