V.Ganga v. N Raman
Case brief
What is this about?
In a property dispute alleging a fraudulent sale deed, the court restrained purchasers from alienating or encumbering the property but refused protection of the plaintiff's claimed possession. Mortgage enforcement required court permission. Additional documents were received subject to proof, and compensatory deposits were directed.
What did the court decide?
Injunctions against alienation or encumbrance granted; additional documents taken on file subject to admissibility, relevance and proof. Compensatory deposits directed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2018 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN O.A. Nos.1044 to 1047 of 2017 and A. No.8168 of 2017 in C.S. No.796 of 2017
V.Ganga, W/o.Late M.Venkatachalam, 24, North Street, Aragandanallur, Thirukoilur, Villupuram District 605 752 ... Applicant/Plaintiff (in all applications) -Versus-
- N.Raman, S/o. K.Natesan, No.18/29, 2nd Street Seevaram, Perungudi, Chennai 600 056
- M/s. MGP Builders and Developers Pvt.Ltd Rep.by its Managing Director, Mr.Prabhu Paulraj, No.27, Andavar Street Thilagar Avenue, Balaiah Garden, Madipakkam, Chennai 600 091
- Vinodh Kumar Velayudham, S/o. S.Velayudham, Suite 2501, No.2, Forest Laneway Apartments, Toronto, Ontario, M2N 5X7, rep.by his Power agents Mrs.Archana Viswanathan, W/o.Mr.V.Vinodh Kumar Old No.13/1/1, New No.12/1/1 Mylapooran Street, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014
- V.Vasanth Kumar S/o. S.Velaydham,
- V.Prema, W/o. S.Velayudham, 4 & 5 are at Old No.13/1/1, New No.12/1/1, Mylapooran Street Royapettah, Chennai 600 014
2
- K.Kalaivani, D/o.Kannan, H No.20/9, Peters Colony, Paters Road, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Should interim injunctions protect the plaintiff's claimed possession and restrain purchasers from alienating or encumbering the disputed property?
Should enforcement of the equitable mortgages be restrained pending trial?
Should the plaintiff's additional documents be taken on file?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
V.Ganga
- respondent
N.Raman
- respondent
M/s. MGP Builders and Developers Pvt.Ltd
- respondent
Vinodh Kumar Velayudham
- respondent
V.Vasanth Kumar
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court