Allowed

The Manager (Materials) v. P.Ponram

Madras HC22 Jan 2018A/7278/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a single-paragraph order where the Court allowed an application challenging the Master's dismissal of a Section 47 CPC application via a non-definitive order and remitted the matter to decide the issues on merits.

What did the court decide?

The order in A.No.4846 of 2017 dated 10.10.2017 is set aside and the matter is remitted to the learned Master to decide the issues and pass a judicial order allowing or dismissing the application.

The Manager (Materials) Vs P.Ponram — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2018

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶5

A.No. 7278 of 2017 in A.No.4846 of 2017 in E.P.No.7 of 2017 in Arbitration Award Case No.M & SEFC/CBER/11/2016

¶6

E.P.No.7 OF 2017 & A.No.7278 OF 2017

¶7

P.Ponram, Managing Partner, Unicon Engineers, 513/A/6 Bharathi Road, Chinnavedampatti, Coimbatore-641 049. ...Applicant/Petitioner/ Decree-holder claimant (A.No.7278 OF 2017) -Versus-

¶8

The Manager (Materials), M/s.Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd., L.L.A.Building II Floor, 735, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondent/ Respondent Judgment-Debtor (A.No.7278 OF 2017)

¶9

A.No.4846 of 2017

¶10

The Manager (Materials), M/s.Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd., L.L.A.Building II Floor, 735, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Applicant/Respondent -Vs.P.Ponram, Managing Partner, Unicon Engineers, 513/A/6 Bharti Road, Chinnavedampatty, Coimbatore-641 049. ..Respondent/Decree Holder

¶11

¶12

A.No.7278 of 2017

¶13

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the order dt. 10.10.2017 in A.No.4846/2017 in E.P.No.7 of 2017 in Arbitral award case No.M & SEFC/CBER/11/2016, passed by the Hon'ble Master, High Court Madras.

¶14

This Application coming on this day before this Court for hearing The court made the following order:

¶15

This application has been filed challenging the order passed by the learned Master in A.No.4846 of 2017 dated 10.10.2017.

¶16

A.No.4846 of 2017 had been filed by the Judgment debtor in E.P.No.7 of 2017. This application had been filed under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The learned Master by an order dated 10.10.2017 had concluded the order by finally stating “Accordingly, this application is held as not maintainable”. The learned Master had not answered the issues raised and had not held whether the application is allowed or dismissed. It must be kept in mind under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, all questions which arise between the parties have to be decided by the executing Court and consequently there was a burden caused on the learned Master as an Officer deciding execution petitions to give a judicial orders, on all the applications filed before him particularly an application filed under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

¶17

Consequently, the matter has to be necessarily remitted back to the learned Master with directions to decide afresh the issues raised by the applicant in A.No.4846 of 2017 and pass a judicial pronouncement either allowed the application or dismissing the application. Holding the application is not maintainable would not serve the ends of the Justice.

¶18

¶19

Consequently, the order passed in A.No.4846 of 2017 dated 10.10.2017 by the learned Master is set aside and the said application is once again remitted back to the learned Master. The matter has to be posted before the learned Master for the hearing on 29.01.2018.

¶20

The learned Master is directed to decide the issue within a period of two months, namely, on or before 28.03.2018.

¶21

Consequently, A.No.7278 of 2017 is allowed with the above observations.

¶22

//Certified to be true copy//

¶23

Dated at Madras this the day of 2018.

¶24

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶25

jj 09/03/18

¶26

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

The Manager (Materials) v. P.Ponram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Manager (Materials) v. P.Ponram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tvl.T.K.K.N.N.Vysya Charities Vs Global Plastics

Tvl.T.K.K.N.N.Vysya Charities Vs M/s.Shanthi Engineering Works

Mr. Vijay G Prabhu Vs a vessel namely, Tb Parasea

Minor of Divya Prabha Vs

Kunjumol Baby Vs Dr.Sivamurugan

V.v.v.Nachiappan Vs P.M.Elavarasan