Dismissed

Kirtibhai B.Shah v. M/S.Anish Metals Pvt. Ltd.

Madras HC17 Sept 2018A/411/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought leave to substitute Kirtibhai B. Shah for Pravin Shah and continue proceedings. The learned counsel for the applicant moved to withdraw the application. The court noted the applicant's presence and the withdrawal instructions, then dismissed the application as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

The application was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant during the hearing.

Kirtibhai B.Shah Vs M/S.Anish Metals Pvt. Ltd. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

¶5

A.No.411 of 2013 in

¶6

C.S.No.88 of 2006

¶7

M/s.Anish Metals Private Ltd. rep.by its Managing Director Pravin Shah having its Office at 70, Kansara Chawl Mumbai

¶8

... Plaintiff

¶9

-Versus-

¶10

M/s. Chitrahar Traders, a firm represented by its Partners i) R.Krishnamurthy ii) P.K.Ganeshwar iii) V.Sivakumar

¶11

R.Krishnamurthy

¶12

P.K.Ganeshwar

¶13

V.Sivakumar Partners, Chitrahar Traders

¶14

Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd rep.by its Chairman ... Defendants A.No.411 of 2013 Kirtibhai B.Shah S/o. Shri Babulal N.Shah 1002 Sulsha, R.R.Thakkar Marg Walkeshwar, Mumbai ...Proposed Plaintiff/Proposed Applicant Vs https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1. M/s.Anish Metals Private Ltd. rep.by its Managing Director

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

¶17

Pravin Shah having its Office at 70, Kansara Chawl Mumbai

¶18

M/s. Chitrahar Traders, a firm represented by its Partners i) R.Krishnamurthy ii) P.K.Ganeshwar iii) V.Sivakumar 7 Cathedral Garden Road Flat No.d2, 4th Floor, A1- Hafez Residency Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034.

¶19

R.Krishnamurthy S/o. Late Ramasamy Gonder 69 Uthukli Main Road Karumarampalaym Mannarai Tiruppur 7.

¶20

P.K.Ganeshwar S/o. Krishnasamy Gounder 21, Pollachi Road, Palladam, Coimbatore District.

¶21

V.Sivakumar s/o. K.Veluchamy Gounder 101-B II Floor, Shree Lakshmi Towers, 257 Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore. Partners, Chitrahar Traders

¶22

Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd rep.by its Chairman, 135, Periyar EVR High Road, Chennai 600 010 ...Respondents 2 to 6 / Defendants 1 to 5

¶23

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to this applicant should not be granted leave to substitute his name Kirtibhai B.Shah instead of Pravin Shah and to continue the proceeding pending disposal of the suit.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

¶26

This application coming on this day before this

¶27

court for hearing, the court made the following order:

¶28

Mr.S.Ramachandran, learned counsel on record for the applicant herein submits that he has instructions from the applicant to withdraw this application. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file, which reads as follows:

¶29

“I may be permitted to withdraw the above application.”

¶30

2.To be noted, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the applicant is present in Court and that the aforesaid endorsement has been made on instructions from the applicant.

¶31

In the light of the narrative supra, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶32

Dated this the th day of 2018.

¶33

KY/26.09.2018 COURT OFFICER

¶34

From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kirtibhai B.Shah v. M/S.Anish Metals Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kirtibhai B.Shah v. M/S.Anish Metals Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Novartis Ag Vs Saimirra Innopharm Pvt.Ltd.

M/S Mohamad Idris Bros Pvt., Vs Mohamad Idris Bros Sons Fabric

Viceroy Exports (India) Pvt. Lt Vs Owners and Parties Inrerested

The State of Tamilnadu Vs P.P.Thomas Government Contrcto

Viceroy Exports Pvt. Ltd., Vs Oweners And Parties Interested

Bharathi Consumer Care Vs Ganesh Industries