This order dismisses two applications having been pressed by the applicant. The court directed post-filing of draft issues and provided a date for the next listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.Nos.1022 & 5968 of 2016 in C.S.No.859 of 2016
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
A.No.1022 of 2016 has been filed to pass an ad interim injunction restraining the defendants 2 to 5 and their men, agents, servants, or anybody on
behalf of them from interfering with plaintiffs peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule C property.
A.No.5968 of 2016 has been filed to direct the respondents to deposit the rent for the suit schedule property.
2. Heard both sides.
these applications. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
counsel for the applicants, these applications are dismissed as not pressed.
Gv
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 10.12.2024
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
gv
A.Nos.1022 & 5968 of 2016 in C.S.No.859 of 2016
10.12.2024
A.A.NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
