K.Muruganandam, Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition sought a direction to pay retirement benefits with interest to a retired traffic driver of a Transport Corporation. The Single Judge ordered the corporation to pay outstanding terminal benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments with 6% interest, rising to 18% on delayed payments.
What did the court decide?
Directions to pay un-settled terminal benefits in 12 monthly instalments with 6% interest, or 18% if delayed.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.01.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P(MD)No.714 of 2017
K.Muruganandam
... Petitioner
.vs
The Managing Director Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Coimbatore Limited, 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore – 641 043
... Respondent
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the retirement benefits with interest to the petitioner in view of the representation dated 26.12.2016.
For Petitioner : M/s. S.Royce Immanuel For Respondent : Mr.K.Sathiya Singh
ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Transport Corporation is directed to pay the petitioner's un-settled retirement benefits.
Whether the retirement benefits are to be paid via monthly instalments with interest.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Muruganandam
- respondent
The Managing Director Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Coimbatore Limited
Coram
S. Vaidyanathan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court