The petitioner sought a direction to implement a previous order from June 2015 regarding his representation. The Court directed the Tahsildar to pass orders within one week following the earlier directive, dismissing the petition otherwise.
Direction to pass orders within one week in pursuance of the earlier Court order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 12.04.2017 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P(MD)No.4706 of 2017
B.J.Basheer Ali @ Ahamed
..Petitioner
Vs
1.The Tahsildar, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District.
2.Patharunnisha
..Respondents.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to implement the order of this Court made in W.P(MD)No.9146 of 2015, dated 09.06.2015.
For Petitioner : M/s.S.Gokul Raj
For Respondents : Mr.M.Alagathevan Special Govt.Pleader
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a direction to the first respondent to implement the order of this Court made in W.P(MD)No.9146 of 2015, dated 09.06.2015.
2.MrM.Alagathevan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent.
3.By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.
4.The Petitioner has already for the same relief, approached this Court by way of W.P.No.9146 of 2015, in which, this Court had given a direction by its order, dated 9.6.2015, which is extracted hereunder:
''4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion as to the merits
of the contentions raised by the Petitioner in this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the first respondent to consider the
2
representation of the Petitioner, dated 28.4.2015 on merits and in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders after giving opportunity to the second respondent and any other interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.''
5.According to the Petitioner, despite the direction by this Court, no follow up action has been taken by the first respondent in complying with the direction passed by this Court in the above said Writ Petition. According to the petitioner, that he had attempted to file a Contempt Petition and the same was not entertained by the Registry, in view of the limitation of one year, as the contempt petition is stated to have been filed after expiry of one year. In the above circumstances, the Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the same relief by way of a separate Writ Petition.
6.Mr.M.Alagathevan, learned Special Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents would submit that any direction issued by this Court, is immediately complied with, within the time stipulated by this Court.
7.In view of the above submission, the first respondent is directed to pass orders immediately not later than a period of one week from today, in pursuance of the direction passed by this Court in the earlier Writ Proceedings, which is extracted supra.
8.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Writs)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Tahsildar, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District.
+1 cc to Mr.S.Gokul raj , Advocate in SR.No. 51647 +1 cc to Special Government Pleader in SR.No:52074
vsn
AE/JC/SAR2/26.04.2017/2P/4C
W.P(MD)No.4706 of 2017 12.04.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the first respondent to implement the previous order dated 09.06.2015 in W.P(MD)No.9146 of 2015.
B.J.Basheer Ali @ Ahamed
The Tahsildar, Manaparai Taluk, Trichy District
Patharunnisha
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
