The Madras High Court allowed a writ petition seeking permission for an Orchestra programme. The court directed the second respondent to consider a pending representation and dispose of it within two days.
The second respondent is directed to look into the representation dated 07.03.2017 and dispose of the same within a period of two days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.03.2017
CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD) No.4198 of 2017
Narayanan
-vs-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to conduct Orchestra (Innisai Kacheri) scheduled to be held on 08.04.2017 at 09.00 p.m. to 12.00 p.m. in Thiruvizha at Arlumighu Pon Esakkiamman Kovil, Thiraviya Nagar, Mathalamparai, Tirunelveli Dist.
For Petitione : Mr.S.Sivakumar
For Respondents : Mr.K.Guru Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J .]
This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Orchestra programme in the place mentioned in the petition, by way of issuing a Writ of Mandamus.
2.It is seen from the records that on 07.03.2017, a representation has been given, but the same has not been considered. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
3.In fine, this Writ Petition is allowed in part without cost. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation dated 07.03.2017 and dispose of the same within a period of two days.
Sd/-
Assitant Registrar(RTI)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
+1cc to M/s.S.SIVAKUMAR, Advocate, in SR No. 14856 MJ AAM-CM MSA/SAR2/15.03.2017 2P 4c
W.P(MD) No.4198 of 2017 15.03.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent police authorities should be directed to consider the pending representation for permission to conduct a cultural programme.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narayanan
Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District
Inspector of Police, Pavoorchathiram Police Station
A.Selvam
N.Authinathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
