The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed this writ petition in part, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation for a public dance program within two days.
The second respondent directed to look into the representation dated 01.03.2017 and dispose of the same within a period of two days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.03.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.3902 of 2017
N.Raja
.. Petitioner
Vs.
.. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to grant permission and give police protection to conduct the Adalum Padalum dance program at about 7.00pm to 11.00pm on 12.03.2017 in pursuance to the festival of Arulmighu Sri Angalaparameswari, Parameswaran Kovil situated in Komapuram, Kantharvakottai, Pudukkottai District on considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.03.2017 and pass such further or other orders.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan,
Special Government Pleader.
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J. ]
This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Adalpadal programme in the place mentioned in the petition, by way of issuing a writ of mandamus.
2.Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ taken notice for the respondents.
2
3.It is seen from the records that on 01.03.2017 a representation has been given, but the same has not been considered. Under the said circumstances, this Court is inclined to pass the following order.
4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the second respondent is directed to look into the representation dated 01.03.2017 and dispose of the same within a period of two days.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1 cc to MR.M.Gnanagurunathan, ADVOCATE, SR NO:12716
ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.3902 of 2017 06.03.2017
ps
MKV-SV-MMS-SAR 3/7.3.2017/2P-4C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation regarding permission for a public dance program.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Raja
The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District
The Inspector of Police, Kantharvakottai Police Station
A.Selvam
N.Authinathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
