Disposed

A. Radhakrishnan v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC24 Feb 2017WP(MD)/3207/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 at the consent of parties. The court directed the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2017 regarding promotion/transfer in light of G.O.Ms.No.150 dated 19.08.1998 and decide the same within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.01.2017 and decide it on merits in light of G.O.Ms.No.150 dated 19.08.1998 within six weeks.

A. Radhakrishnan Vs the Secretary to Government — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 24.02.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.(MD) No.3207 of 2017

¶6

A.Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner

¶7

-vs-

¶8

1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MUNCIPALITY ADMINISTRATION AND METRO WATER SUPPLY (PAN 2) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIATE CHENNAI - 09.

¶9

2 THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN PANCHAYAT KURULAGAM 4TH FLOOR CHENNAI - 108.

¶10

3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KARUR DISTRICT KARUR.

¶11

4 THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PANCHAYAT DINDIGUL ZONE DINDIGUL COLLECTOR OFFICE DINDIGUL.

¶12

5 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER PULIYUR TOWN PANCHAYAT PULIYUR KARUR DISTRICT. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to appoint the petitioner on promotion / transfer from the service of the 5th respondent herein pursuant to the representation dated 27.01.2017 in the light of G.O.Ms.No.150 dated 19.08.1998 on the file of the 1st respondent herein.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Illanchezian

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajarajan Govt. Advocate

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

Mr.M.Rajarajan, Government Advocate, accepts notice for the respondents. By consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

2.The prayer in the writ petition is for a Mandamus directing

¶20

¶21

the 2^nd respondent to appoint the petitioner on promotion / transfer from the service of the 5th respondent herein pursuant to the representation dated 27.01.2017 in the light of G.O.Ms.No.150 dated 19.08.1998 on the file of the 1^st respondent herein.

¶22

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with regard to his grievance of getting promotion, he had given a representation dated 27.01.2017 to the third respondent, wherein, he sought for consideration of his grievance for getting promotion in the light of G.O.Ms.No.150 dated 19.08.1998, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department. He further submits that if the said representation is directed to be considered by this Court within a time frame stipulated, the petitioner would be satisfied.

¶23

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate in this regard.

¶24

5.In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to consider the representation given by the petitioner on 27.01.2017 and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law, especially, in the light of the Government order in G.O.Ms.No.150 Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 19.08.1998 and pass orders thereon within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(AE)

¶28

/True Copy/

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

¶31

¶32

1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT MUNCIPALITY ADMINISTRATION AND METRO WATER SUPPLY (PAN 2) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIATE CHENNAI - 09.

¶33

2 THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN PANCHAYAT KURULAGAM 4TH FLOOR CHENNAI - 108.

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KARUR DISTRICT KARUR.

¶35

¶36

4 THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PANCHAYAT DINDIGUL ZONE DINDIGUL COLLECTOR OFFICE DINDIGUL.

¶37

5 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER PULIYUR TOWN PANCHAYAT PULIYUR KARUR DISTRICT.

¶38

+1cc to Mr.V.Illanchzian, Advocate Sr.No. 10549

¶39

+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No. 10539

¶40

JAM/10.03.17 /PN/3p-8c

¶41

W.P.(MD)No.3207 of 2017 24.02.2017

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A. Radhakrishnan v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A. Radhakrishnan v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B. Kottai Ilangovan, Vs the Secretary to Government

K.Sakthivairavan Vs the Assistant Executive

Thavasilingam, Vs the Superintendent of Police

P. Mahalingam, Vs the Managing Director

L.Kodikkumar, Vs the Commissioner

T.Suresh Jeyaraj Vs Joint Commissioner