Writ petition filed for issuance of mandamus directing respondent authorities to dispose of a representation. Petitioner made no appearance on the hearing dates. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution with no costs.
No costs. Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:03.03.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
Writ Petition(MD)No.2777 of 2013
M.Rajesh ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Executive Director, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Marketing Division,
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34.
2.The Senior Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Madurai Divisional Office, No.2, Race Course Road,
Chokkikulam, Madurai – 625 002. ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 11.09.2012.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.K.Muraleedharan
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing on 22.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(AE)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
pm
+1 cc to Mr.K.Muraleedharan, Advocate Sr.No.12460
CSL/SKN/RSK/14.3.17-2p-2C
W.P(MD)No.2777 of 2013 03.03.2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Rajesh
Executive Director, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Marketing Division
Senior Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Madurai Divisional Office
M.S.Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
