Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition challenging a market auction. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected M.P. closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 14.03.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
W.P.(MD)No.20757 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014
M.Ganesan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Arianagar Anna Maligai, Tallakulam, Madurai.
... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to cancel the auction said to have been conducted on 16.12.2014 and direct the respondent to conduct fresh auction for the daily market at Keelamaratvethi, Madurai.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthaiah,
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, this Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.is closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
+1CC to M/S.J.Gunaseelan Muthaiah, Advocate, SR.No. 14600
nbj
AM/MR/SAR 4/18.04.2017/1P/2C
M. Ganesan
The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
