Disposed

S.Shanmugam v. the District Collector

Madras HC10 Jan 2017WP(MD)/17085/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of two writ petitions seeking directions to a bank to sanction loans under PMEGMP. The court held that since the applications were rejected by the bank in an order dated 05.12.2016, the petitions were not maintainable without challenging that order, and granted liberty to do so.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to challenge the rejection order dated 05.12.2016 passed by the respondent bank.

S.Shanmugam Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.01.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU W.P(MD)Nos.17085 and 17086 of 2015

¶3

W.P(MD)No.17085 of 2015

¶4

S.Shanmugam .. Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District Sivagangai. 2.The General Manager – cum – Joint Director, District Industrial Centre, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 3.The Regional Manager, Indian Bank, Regional Office, Madurai. 4.The Manager, Indian Bank,

¶5

Okkur, Sivagnagai Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents

¶6

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 3^rd and 4^th respondents to issue loan sanction order to the petitioner's Hollow Blocks Super, under the Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP) as recommended by the 2^nd respondent letter dated 22.07.2014.

¶7

W.P(MD)No.17086 of 2015

¶8

S.Nalliappan .. Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District,Sivagangai. 2.The General Manager – cum – Joint Director, District Industrial Centre, Sivagangai,Sivagangai District. 3.The Regional Manager, Indian Bank,Regional Office, Madurai. 4.The Manager, Indian Bank, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Okkur, Sivagnagai Taluk, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents

¶9

¶10

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr. G.Ghouse Khathiri For R1 & R2 : Mr. A.Muthukaruppan, Additional Government Pleader For R3 & R4 : No appearance

¶12

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶13

The petitioners in both writ petitions individually seek for a direction to the respondent bank to issue loan sanction order under Prime Minister's Employment Generation Programme.

¶14

After issuance of notice in these writ petitions, today the matters are taken for further hearing.

¶15

The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, based on instructions, submitted that the petitioner's applications were rejected by the bank on 05.12.2016 itself by passing separate orders.

¶16

When that being the factual position, the petitioners cannot maintain the present writ petitions that too for seeking mandamus without challenging the above said order dated 05.12.2016. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the above said order passed by the respondent bank in the manner known to law. No costs.

¶17

Sd/-

¶18

Assistant Registrar(Records)

¶19

/TRUE COPY/

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

To,

¶22

The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶23

The General Manager – cum – Joint Director, District Industrial Centre, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.

¶24

+1 cc to MR.J.John,ADVOCATE, SR NO:2035

¶25

+2cc to M/S.THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR NO:2168,2169

¶26

W.P(MD)Nos.17085 and 17086 of 2015 10.01.2017

¶27

¶28

sva/bs/08.02.2017/2p/6c

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Shanmugam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Shanmugam v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tmt.Menaha Vs the Registered General

V.Rameshkumar, S/O.P.Veerasamy Vs the Commissioner

Sabarish, S/O.S.Malarvizhi, Vs Reserve Bank of India

R.Brindha Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

The District Collector Vs P.Ragunanthkumar

T.Udayakumar Vs the District Collector