Dismissed

Balamani v. the Executive Officer

Madras HC24 Jul 2017WP(MD)/16654/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought to prevent eviction of a petty shop without following due process via writ under Article 226. During hearing, the petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, and the court dismissed it accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

Balamani Vs the Executive Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 24.07.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.16654 of 2015

¶7

Balamani ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Executive Officer,

¶10

Thirukattupalli Selection Grade Panchayat,

¶11

Boothalur Taluk,

¶12

Thanjavur District.

¶13

The Chairman,

¶14

Thirukattupalli Selection Grade Panchayat,

¶15

Boothalur Taluk,

¶16

Thanjavur District.

¶17

The Inspector of Police,

¶18

Thirukattupalli Police Station,

¶19

Thanjavur District.

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner's petty shop from Thirukattupalli bus stand without following due process of law.

¶22

For Petitioner ... Mr.R.Alagumani

¶23

For R.1 ... Mr.V.Chandrasekar

¶24

Additional Government Pleader For R.2 & R.3 ... Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Government Advocate

¶25

- - - - ORDER

¶26

This writ petition has been filed, seeking to forbear the respondents from evicting the petitioner's petty shop from Thirukattupalli bus stand without following due process of law.

¶27

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ approach the appropriate forum and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶28

¶29

In view of the above submission and endorsement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for by the petitioner. No costs.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶32

/True Copy/

¶33

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶34

To:

¶35

The Inspector of Police, Thirukattupalli Police Station,

¶36

Thanjavur District.

¶37

+1cc to Mr.R.Alagumani, Advocate Sr.No.67594

¶38

+1cc to The Spl.Government Pleader SR.No.67603

¶39

RM/SKN

¶40

VB/KP/SAR2/02/08/2017/2P/4C

¶41

W.P(MD)No.16654 of 2015 24.07.2017

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Balamani v. the Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balamani v. the Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

O.L.Kannan Vs K.Vivekanandan IAS

Mr.R.Venkataraman, Vs the Director General of Police

S.Ravi Vs Apoorva Varma IAS

N.Vijayakumari, Vs the District Collector

Kumarasamy Vs the District Collector

K.Palanichamy, S/O.Karuppaiah Vs Madurai Corporation