Petitioner sought certiorari to quash an order of the second respondent. Court held that due to subsequent Supreme Court orders and Government of Tamil Nadu consequentials, the relief became infructuous.
Petition disposed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.10.2017
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.(MD)No.1659 of 2011 and M.P(MD).No.2 of 2011
G.Paramasivan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Campus, Thenampet, Chennai-6.
2.The Deputy Director, Health Services, Viswanathapuram, Madurai.
3.The Medical Officer, Government Primary Health Centre, Kallanthiri, Madurai District. ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.2482/A5/08 dated 05.01.2011 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.R.Velmurugan Government Advocate
O R D E R
This petition has been filed seeking for a direction of writ of certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.2482/A5/08, dated 05.01.2011, on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal.
2.Heard, Mr.S.Rajasekar, learned counsel appearing for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner and Mr.R.Velmurugan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.
2
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, in view of certain orders of the Honourable Supreme Court of India and consequential orders have been passed by the Government of Tamil Nadu, and the relief sought in this writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, no adjudication is necessary in this writ petition.
4.Recording the said submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is disposed accordingly. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(RTI)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Campus, Thenampet, Chennai-6. 2.The Deputy Director, Health Services, Viswanathapuram, Madurai. 3.The Medical Officer, Government Primary Health Centre, Kallanthiri, Madurai District. +1cc to M/S.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate SR.No.83239 +1cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No. 83168 smi/rmk
MAS/KK/SAR1:07.11.2017:2P-6C
| W.P.(MD)No.1659 | of | 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| and | ||
| M.P(MD).No.2 | of | 2011 |
| 23 | .10 | .2017 |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.Paramasivan
The Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Campus, Thenampet, Chennai
The Deputy Director, Health Services, Viswanathapuram, Madurai
The Medical Officer, Government Primary Health Centre, Kallanthiri, Madurai District
P.D.Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
