Ramasubramanian v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a shop functioning without town planning mandates. Court closed the petition as a subsequent approval granted to the property rendered nothing alive for adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed with no costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.10.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.(MD)No.14628 of 2017
Ramasubramanian
: Petitioner
vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Madurai. 2.The Commissioner, Office of the Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Local Planning Authority, Arignar Anna Maligai, Madurai Corporation Building, Madurai. 4.The Member Secretary, Madurai Town Planning Department, Corporation Office Complex, Third Floor, Anna Maligai, Madurai -2. 5.The Proprietor, Saravana Selvarathinam, Ward No.22, Block No.61, Thirupparankundram Main Road, Palanganatham, Madurai-3. : Respondents
(R4 and R5 impleaded as per order of this Court made in W.M.P(MD)No.12099 of 2017 in W.P(MD)No.14628 of 2017, dated 22.08.2017)
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take appropriate action against the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Saravana Selvarathinam shop which is functioning at T.S.No.141/2, Block.61, Ward 22, Madurai based on the information furnished by the first respondent in his reply in Na.Ka.No.1095/17/Mathi.2, dated
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should issue a Writ of Mandamus directing action against a shop functioning without following town planning mandates.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramasubramanian
- respondent
District Collector
- respondent
Commissioner, Madurai Corporation
- respondent
Assistant Commissioner, Madurai Local Planning Authority
- respondent
Member Secretary, Madurai Town Planning Department
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court