Disposed

M.Sivakumar, S/O.a.Muniandi, v. the District Collector

Madras HC27 Jan 2017WP(MD)/1318/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this service dispute, the petitioner challenged a suspension order via Writ Petition seeking Certiorari. The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation for revocation of suspension, and ordered the respondent to consider it by 01.02.2017 before disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to give representation for revocation of suspension; direction to respondent to consider same by 01.02.2017

M.Sivakumar, S/O.a.Muniandi, Vs the District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.01.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P(MD)No.1318 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.1098 & 1099 of 2017

M.Sivakumar

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Madurai District Collectorate, Madurai District. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Head Office, Madurai Zone, Bypass Road, Madurai District. 3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Head Office, Madurai Region, Bypass Road, Madurai District. 4.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Tirupparankuntram Branch Office, Madurai Road, Tirupparankuntram, Madurai District. ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Parvai:Onathu/D4/Pu.ra/3285, dated 11.01.2017 passed by the respondent No.3 on the file of the respondent No.3 and quash the same as illegal.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.M.M.Iqbal For R – 1 : Mr.S.Sathish Kumar Additional Government Pleader For RR 2 to 4 : Mr.A.P.Muthu Pandian

¶8

ORDER

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a

¶11

¶12

Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Parvai:Onathu/D4/Pu.ra/3285, dated 11.01.2017, passed by the third respondent and to quash the same.

¶13

2.Mr.S.Sathish Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.A.P.Muthu Pandian, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents 2 to 4.

¶14

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was suspended from service by the impugned order, dated 11.01.2017 without assigning any reason whatsoever. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner has given a communication on 09.01.2017 for permitting to deposit the money in the treasury. Further, the learned counsel submitted that the third respondent has not considered the letter, dated 09.01.2017 while passing the impugned order of suspension on 11.01.2017.

¶15

4.Mr.A.P.Muthu Pandian, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 4 submitted that the petitioner may be directed to give a representation to the third respondent afresh today itself and in the event of the petitioner giving a representation for revocation of the order of suspension, the same would be considered immediately.

¶16

5.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner would given his representation today ie., 27.01.2017.

¶17

6.Having regard to the submissions made on either side, I direct the petitioner to give a representation to the third respondent today itself for revocation of the order of suspension and in the event of the petitioner giving his representation today ie., on 27.01.2017, the third respondent is directed to consider the same and pass orders on or before 01.02.2017.

¶18

7.With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar (RTI)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

¶26

¶27

1.The District Collector, Madurai District Collectorate, Madurai District. 2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Head Office, Madurai Zone, Bypass Road, Madurai District. 3.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Head Office, Madurai Region, Bypass Road, Madurai District. 4.The Branch Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited, Tirupparankuntram Branch Office, Madurai Road, Tirupparankuntram, Madurai District. +1 cc to Mr.A.P.MuthuPandian,Advocate, Sr.No: 4444 +1cc to Mr. Mr.M.M.Iqbal Advocate Sr.No. 4678 JAM/27.01.2017/EM/SAR 3 / 2P-7C

¶28

W.P(MD)No.1318 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.1098 & 1099 of 2017

¶29

27.01.2017

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Sivakumar, S/O.a.Muniandi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Sivakumar, S/O.a.Muniandi, v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.S.Palanisamy Vs Renganath

K. Thangam Vs Subburaj

T.G.Sankaranathan Vs K.B.Sanji Reddy

K.S. Sivanathan Vs Principal Chief Conservator of

C.Subash Pandaram Vs the Chirman

Tvl.Lego Marbles Vs the Commissioner of