Single judge order disposing of a writ petition. Court directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representations regarding land survey and take necessary action within six weeks after affording a hearing opportunity.
Directed respondent to consider petitioner's representations and take action within six weeks after hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P(MD)No.12258 of 2017
Vellimalai .. Petitioner
Vs.
The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. .. Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to Survey the lands in Palakkanoothu Village in Old S.F.Nos.273/10, 273/4, 273/6, 273/8 and 273/9 and New Survey Nos.273/6, 273/10 and 273/15 situated in Kambalinaickanpatti, Puduchathiram Post, Ottanchathiram Via, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of the petitioner's representations dated 17.04.2017 and 20.06.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthick Subramanian
For Respondent : Mr.C.Selvaraj, Special Government Pleader.
ORDER
This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to survey the petitioner's lands situate in Kambalinaickanpatti, Puduchathiram Post, Ottanchathiram Via, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District, on the basis of the petitioner's representations dated 17.04.2017 and 20.06.2017.
2.Mr.C.Selvaraj, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondent.
3.By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for hearing at the stage of admission itself.
4.Heard both sides.
5.The petitioner made two representation dated 17.04.2017 and 20.06.2017, to the respondent for surveying his lands.
6.The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that it would be suffice, if the representations of the petitioner dated 17.04.2017 and 20.06.2017, are disposed of by the respondent as per https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ law.
2
7.Considering the limited scope of the relief sought for, this Court, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, directs the respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 17.04.2017 and 20.06.2017, and take necessary action, if found fit, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to all the interested parties, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8.The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS—III)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District.
+1cc to THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER in SR. No.63318 +1cc to Mr.S.KARTHICK SUBRAMANIAN Advocate in SR. No.63194
SMN
JS/JC/SAR.2/11.07.2017/2P-4C
ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.12258 of 2017 03.07.2017
Vellimalai
The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District
R.Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
