The Madurai Bench held the writ petition infructuous as the petitioner had been convicted and removed from service, so the authorities were not liable to pay the subsistence allowance. The petition was closed.
Writ petition closed as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.01.2017
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
W.P.(MD) No.1182 of 2014
Lakshmipathyraj
... Petitioner
-vs-
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the subsistence allowance for the period from 17.12.1990 to 26.06.1992 and from 16.12.1999 to 07.02.2005 within the time stipulated by this Honourable court.
For Petitioner : M/s.J.Anandhavalli For R1 to R4 : Mr.A.K.Baskarapandian Spl. Govt. Pleader
The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition, seeking to direct the respondents to pay the subsistence allowance for the period from 17.12.1990 to 26.06.1992 and from 16.12.1999 to 07.02.2005 within the time stipulated by this Honourable court.
2
petitioner has subsequently been convicted and removed from service.
nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed as having been rendered infructuous. No costs.
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
+1cc to Additional Government Pleader SR.NO.466
ar
sm:RR-BS:2.02.2017:2P/6C
W.P.(MD) No.1182 of 2014
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction for payment of subsistence allowance survives for consideration given the petitioner's conviction and removal from service.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakshmipathyraj
The District Collector, Dindigul District
The Director, Survey and Land Records Department
The Additional Director, Survey and Land Records Department
The Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records Department
S. Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
