High Court disposed of this writ petition for Mandamus seeking an alternative site for the petitioner as the claim had already been considered and allotted by the respondent before the order was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.07.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P(MD)No.11368 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015
G.K.Kannan ... Petitioner
Vs.
The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.06.2015 and consequently provide the alternative site in view of the undertaking given by the respondent in the contempt proceedings dated 02.01.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Pasumpon For Respondent : Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah, Government Advocate *****
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.06.2015 and consequently to provide an alternative site, in view of the undertaking given by the respondent in the contempt proceedings dated 02.01.2014.
2
in kt2/022034/15 dated 06.06.2017 and a copy of the same has been produced before this Court.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
/True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
+1 cc to Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah , Advocate in SR.No. 65537
gk/smn
AE/MR KKR/SAR2/24.07.2017/2P/2C
W.P(MD)No.11368 of 2015 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2015
14.07.2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G.K. Kannan
The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
