Dismissed

S.v.S.Kumar, v. the Competent Authority/

Madras HC24 Jan 2017WP(MD)/1102/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Revenue Officer to consider a representation filed during pendency of Tanpid Court proceedings. The Court held the proper course was to approach the competent court directly.

What did the court decide?

No costs. Liberty given to the petitioner to approach the TANPID Court by filing an application in accordance with law.

S.v.S.Kumar, Vs the Competent Authority/ — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED:24.01.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.1102 of 2017

¶7

S.V.S.Kumar .. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Competent Authority/ District Revenue Officer, Madurai District @ Madurai. .. Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.12.2016.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ghouse Yacoob Hussain For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj Special Government Pleader

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 17.12.2016 and pass orders on the same.

¶14

2.Through the said representation, the petitioner wanted certain properties to be attached in respect of the proceedings pending before TANPID Court in C.C.No.17 of 2013.

¶15

3.When admittedly, the proceedings are pending before the competent Court, the petitioner has to only approach the said Court and make appropriate application for redressel of his grievance, if any. Without doing so, the petitioner made a representation to the respondent and wants that representation to be disposed of by filing the present writ petition. I do not think that this is the proper course of action, as the petitioner has only to approach the TANPID Court and file appropriate application.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

4.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by giving

¶18

¶19

liberty to the petitioner to approach the TANPID Court by filing an application, in accordance with law. No costs.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CO)

¶21

/True Copy/

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

¶24

The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District @ Madurai.

¶25

1 CC TO Mr.S.GHOUSE YACOOB HUSSAIN, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 3716 + 1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 4138 RJ2

¶26

TE/CM-MSA/SAR-II : 31/01/2017 : 2P/4C

¶27

W.P.(MD)No.1102 of 2017 24.01.2017

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.v.S.Kumar, v. the Competent Authority/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.v.S.Kumar, v. the Competent Authority/

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D. Inbaraj Vs the Secretry to Govt.

R. Ravi Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

P.Karuppiah Vs the Secretary to Government

R.Abdul Rahman Vs the Passport Officer

Sanofarzahan Mohamed Shakeel, Vs the Regional Pass Port Officer

M.Vadivel Vs the District Collector