Disposed

M.Mohamed Mansoor Hallaj, v. the Inspector General of

Madras HC8 Jun 2017WP(MD)/10710/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

, A petitioner filing under Article 226 sought a writ of Mandamus directing the District Registrar to consider and dispose of his application for cancelling a settlement deed. The Court directed the second respondent to act on the representation on merits within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent to consider the Petitioner's representation on merits within eight weeks, giving notice to interested parties.

M.Mohamed Mansoor Hallaj, Vs the Inspector General of — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED 08.06.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶6

W.P(MD)No.10710 of 2017

¶7

M.Mohamed Mansoor Hallaj Son of late K.A.Mohamed Ismail, represented by his Power Agent M.Mohamed Iqbal. ..Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028.

¶10

The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Kumbakonam,

¶11

Thanjavur District.

¶12

The sub-Registrar, Office of the Sub-Registrar, Papanasam, Thanjavur District. ..Respondents.

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and dispose of the Petitioner's application, dated 2.7.2016 for cancellation of settlement deed in Document No.64 of 2008, on the file of the second respondent, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner :M/s.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents :Mr.M.Alagathevan Spl.Govt.Pleader

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dispose of the Petitioner's application, dated 2.7.2016 for cancellation of settlement deed in Document No.64 of 2008, on the

¶17

¶18

file of the second respondent, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶19

2.Mr.M.Alagathevan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

¶20

3.By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal, at the admission stage itself.

¶21

4.The case of the Petitioner is that he purchased 64 cents of Nanja Land in S.No.350/1 from one Thilsad Begum through a registered sale deed, dated 12.4.2012, registered as Document No.545/2012. While so, one S.A. Jamal Mohamed, who has no right over the property, had executed a Settlement Deed in favour of his wife J.Mumtaj Begum, which was registered as Document No.64 of 2008. Since the settlement is a fraudulent transaction, the Petitioner made a representation to the respondents on 2.7.2016 to cancel the settlement deed. Since no action was taken, the present Writ Petition is filed for the relief stated supra.

¶22

5.Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the second respondent to consider the representation of the Petitioner, dated 02.07.2016 on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders on the same, after giving notice to the Petitioner and other interested parties, if any, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order

¶23

6.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(Records)

¶26

/True Copy/

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 028.

¶30

The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar,

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶32

¶33

The sub-Registrar,

¶34

Office of the Sub-Registrar, Papanasam, Thanjavur District.

¶35

+1cc to Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah, Advocate Sr.No.59299

¶36

+1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.59353

¶37

VSN

¶38

VB/JC/SAR2/28.06.2017/3P/6C

¶39

W.P(MD)No.10710 of 2017

¶40

08.06.2017

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Mohamed Mansoor Hallaj, v. the Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Mohamed Mansoor Hallaj, v. the Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Blesson Das, Vs the Union of India

The Secretary, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

International Youth Fellowship Vs the Director of Social Defence

Tmt.Sekaram, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

S.Seeni Selvaraj Vs the District Collector

Minor B.Minnal, Vs the Director