This writ petition sought mandamus directing the District Revenue Officer to dispose of the petitioner's revision petition on merits after it was not taken on file. The court directed disposal within eight weeks.
Directed the first respondent to pass orders on the revision filed by the petitioner on merits within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 15.06.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.(MD).No.10666 of 2017
S.Saravanakumar
: Petitioner
vs.
1.The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. : Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose the revision petition, dated 09.02.2017 against the order of the second respondent in Ne.Mu.9055/2015(A1), dated 06.01.2017 pending before the first respondent from 09.02.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.Samy For Respondent : Mr.M.Alagathevan Spl. Govt. Pleader
O R D E R
This writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's revision petition, dated 09.02.2017.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.
3.The case of the petitioner is that aggrieved over the order passed by the second respondent in Ne.Mu.9055/2015(A1), https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dated 06.01.2017, he preferred a revision before the first respondent on 09.02.2017. Since the revision is not taken on file and disposed on merits, this writ petition has been filed.
2
4.Mr.M.Alagathevan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner has now preferred the revision before the first respondent and it would be disposed of in accordance with law.
5.In view of the above submission, the first respondent is directed to pass orders on the revision filed by the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law after providing opportunities to the necessary parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of . No
cost.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CSIII)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.
3.The Tahsildar, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District.
+One cc to Mr.K.K.Samy, Advocate, SR.No.60493
am
RL/5C/2P/KP/SAR1/7/7/2017
W.P(MD)No.10666 of 2017
15.06.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner should be directed to dispose the pending revision petition on merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Saravanakumar
The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District
K Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
