Dismissed

Mallika v. the District Collector

Madras HC25 Jul 2017WP(MD)/10507/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition praying for quashing of a plan approval refusal and directing approval of a shop. The court held the petition as withdrawn upon the petitioner's endorsement and closed the connected misc. petition.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

Mallika Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 25.07.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P.(MD)No.10507 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014

¶7

Mallika .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2. The Assistant Director Panchayat, Assistant Director Panchayat Office, Sivagangai. 3. The Block Development Officer, Kallal Union, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. 4. The President, Thalakavoor Village, Kallal Panchayat Union, Sivagangai District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent dated 12.06.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the fourth respondent to give plan approval to the petitioner's shop in Survey No.143/5 situated at Krambuvayal, Keeranipatti Group, Thalayoor Panchayat, Kallal Union, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kameswaran For 1 to 3 Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Additional Government Pleader. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For 4^th Respondent : Mr.M.Govindan

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

¶11

ORDER

¶12

[Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J. ]

¶13

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has made an endorsement indicating that the petitioner is withdrawing the Writ Petition.

¶14

2.In view of the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar(AE)

¶17

/True Copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

¶20

The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

¶21

The Assistant Director Panchayat, Assistant Director Panchayat Office, Sivagangai.

¶22

The Block Development Officer, Kallal Union, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.

¶23

The President, Thalakavoor Village, Kallal Panchayat Union, Sivagangai District.

¶24

+1cc to The Spl.Government Pleader SR.No.68399

¶25

PS/KM

¶26

VB/KP/SAR2/02/08/2017/2P/6C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

W.P.(MD)No.10507 of 2014 25.07.2017

Mallika v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mallika v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Chairman, Vs P. Anantha Raja

Kalidas Vs the District Collector

The Commissioner, Vs K.Kumari Selvan

Kasinathan Vs the District Collector

Sethuraman Vs the District Collector

K. Manikandan, Vs the Commissioner