2.It is stated in the petition that the petitioner was appointed as Office Assistant in the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar District on 17.08.1994 and he was promoted as Junior Bailiff on 23.12.1995 and thereafter, Senior Bailiff on 28.12.2005. While so, on 13.07.2011 one Karuppasamy has given a complaint against the petitioner before the first respondent stating that under the false promise of a getting job in the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, the petitioner has received a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and cheated him. Based on the said complaint, the first respondent issued a show cause notice to the petitioner, for which the petitioner has sent his reply. Not being satisfied with the reply submitted by the petitioner, the first respondent issued a charge memo on 26.02.2013, for which he has submitted his explanation on 11.06.2013. Again, not being satisfied with the said explanation, the first respondent appointed the second respondent as Enquiry Officer. Without providing sufficient opportunity, the Enquiry Officer submitted the enquiry report to the first respondent. After receipt of the enquiry receipt, on 19.12.2013 the first respondent has passed an order in D.No.9480 reverting him from the post of Senior Bailiff to the lower post of Junior Bailiff as punishment and also directed him to refund the amount due to the complainant. On the same day, the first respondent has also passed an order in D.No.9485 transferring him to Sub Court, Sivakasi as Junior Bailiff. Challenging the said orders, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition.
