Writ petition filed to direct construction of a Village Service Centre. Court dismissed the petition as the Panchayat subsequently decided not to proceed with construction.
No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 16.08.2017
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.1016 of 2017
and W.M.P(MD)No.847 of 2017
R.Subramanian ... Petitioner
Vs.
6.The Panchayat President, Seelaipillayarputhur Panchayat, Thottiyam, Trichy District.
(R7 is impleaded vide Court order dated 18.07.2017 in WMP(MD)No.9572 of 2017) ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to construct a Village Service Centre in Survey No.268/8 near the Kamatchiamman Temple as per the resolution passed in Panchyat based on the petitioner's representation dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 18.10.2016.
2
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susi Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Addl. Govt. Pleader for RR 1 to 4 No Appearance for R5.
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.)
The petitioner filed this writ petition to direct the first respondent to construct a Village Service Centre at Survey No.268/8 near the Kamatchiamman Temple pursuant to the resolution passed by the Panchayat.
2.The learned Additional Government Pleader by producing a copy of the proceedings dated 19.07.2017 submitted that in view of the contrary to the stand taken by the members of the Panchayat and taking into account the objection raised in regard to the construction of the service centre, a decision was taken not to construct the service centre.
3.In view of the said decision, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. It is always open to the petitioner to workout his remedy in the manner known to law.
4.The writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(C.O)
/True Copy/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
Seelaipillayarputhur Panchayat, Thottiyam, Trichy District. 7.The Special Officer, Executive Officer, Thottiyam, Trichy District.
+One cc to M/s.M.Subash Babu, Advocate, SR.No.72803
+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.73215 skm/Arul
RL/10C/2P/KP/SAR1/5/9/2017 W.P(MD)No.1016 of 2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and W.M.P(MD)No.847 of 2017 16.08.2017
R.Subramanian
The District Collector, Trichy
K.K.SASIDHARAN
G.R.SWAMINATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
