Allowed

R.Rangarajan v. The Director of Government

Madras HC30 Jan 2017WP/927/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court issued a writ of mandamus directing the school and educational authorities to include a student in the nominal roll and allow his appearance in the 10th Standard Matriculation Examination, condoning his absence due to jaundice and vomiting blood.

What did the court decide?

The fifth respondent school and the first respondent are directed to allow the petitioner's son, Kavin Sandron, to be included in the nominal roll to write the 10th standard examination in March 2017.

R.Rangarajan Vs The Director of Government — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶2

Dated: 30.01.2017

¶3

Coram

¶4

The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

W.P.No.927 of 2017

¶6

and

¶7

WMP No.933 of 2017
R.Rangarajan ..Petitioner
Vs
1 The Director of Government
Examinations (School Education),
College Road, Chennai 6.
2 The Director of
Matriculation Education (State Board),
College Road, Chennai 6.
3 The Chief Educational Officer,
Cuddalore, Pennar Road, Manjakuppam,
Cuddalore 1.
4 The Inspector of Matriculation Schools,
Cuddalore 1.
5 The Principal,
Kamaraj Matriculation Higher Secondary
School, 70, Vengan Street,
Chidambaram 608 001. ..Respondents

¶8

Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to permit petitioner's son, R.R.Kavin Sandron, to write the Government 10^th Standard Matriculation Examination which is to be held early in March 2017 as a school candidate included in the Nominal Roll of Kamaraj Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Chidambaram.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

For Petitioner : Proff.S.Krishnaswamy

¶11

For Respondents: Mr.V.Anandamoorthy for R1 to R4 Additional Government Pleader Mr.P.Nagaraju for R5

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to direct the respondents to permit petitioner's son, R.R.Kavin Sandron, to write the Government 10^th Standard Matriculation Examination which is to be held early in March 2017 as a school candidate included in the Nominal Roll of Kamaraj Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Chidambaram.

¶14

2.According to the petitioner, his son R.R.Kavin Sandron is studying in 10^th standard in the fifth respondent school and that siince he was suffering from jaundice and vomiting blood, he could not attend the school in the month of July 2016. He approached the school to permit his son to attend the class and to write 10^th standard Government Matriculation Examination. He further made a representation to the second and fourth respondents and to all concerned authorities. The fifth respondent has not taken any steps. Hence, the present writ petition.

¶15

3.The fourth respondent has filed a counter wherein it is stated that in paragraph No.4 has categorically stated that fifth respondent after receiving the orders from the Director of Matriculation Schools ought to have obeyed his orders and admitted the student in the school duly including Kavin Sandron in the nominal roll. If the nominal roll containing the name list was already submitted, she should have reported the fact to the Inspector of Matriculation Schools or to the Director of Government Examinations Chennai for taking further necessary action but they kept silent. The fifth respondent would contend that even after the admission given by the third responent, the petitioner has attended school only for five days and therefore, he lacks attendance.

¶16

4.Heard all the parties.

¶17

5.Considering the fact that the authority has every right to condone the absence of a student in an extraordinary cases especially where the student was affected by serious illness. In this case, the petitioner's son was absent due to jaundice and vomiting blood supported by records. In such circumstances, the authorities shall include the student as one of the student and allow the student to attend the classes treating his as a

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

special case not as a precedent. Therefore, the fifth respondent school and the first respondent are directed to allow the petitioner's son viz., Kavin Sandron to be included in the nominal roll so as to enable him to write the tenth standard examination in March 2017, by facilitating the school to enroll the student Kavin Sandron by opening online. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

sd/

¶21

Assistant Registrar

¶22

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vri
To
1 The Director of Government
Examinations (School Education),
College Road, Chennai 6.
2 The Director of
Matriculation Education (State Board),
College Road, Chennai 6.
3 The Chief Educational Officer,
Cuddalore, Pennar Road, Manjakuppam,
Cuddalore 1.
4 The Inspector of Matriculation Schools,
Cuddalore 1.
5 The Principal,
Kamaraj Matriculation Higher Secondary
School, 70, Vengan Street,
Chidambaram 608 001.
+1cc to Mr.Krishnasamy, Advocate SR.No.5409
+1cc to Mr.P.Nagaraju, Advocate SR.No.5439
+1cc to the Government Pleader, SR.No.5964
W.P.No.927 of 2017
PPA(CO)
GN(01/02/2017)

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Rangarajan v. The Director of Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Rangarajan v. The Director of Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Dilli Babu, Vs The Post Master

N.K.Abubacker Vs The District Revenue Officer

Mrs.C.Shantha, Vs The Secretary to Govt. of

M/s.Sripathy Assoceates Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

R.Sukumaran, Vs The District Collector

Monika, Vs The Sub Registrar