R.Thirumaran v. The Principal Secretary to
Case brief
What is this about?
Bench closed a writ petition challenging alleged shifting of a TASMAC shop. Counsel informed the court that the subject shop is closed and no relocation is proposed. No relief granted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.04.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHNDRABAABU
Writ Petition No.9133 of 2017
and WMP.No.10057 of 2017
R.Thirumaran ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George,
Chennai - 600 009.
- The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise,
- Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
- 3.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.
- 4.The Managing Director,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Thirumaran
- respondent
The Principal Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department
- respondent
The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise
- respondent
The District Collector, Chennai
- respondent
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court