Disposed

K.Nadandiammal v. The National Human Rights

Madras HC18 May 2017WP/9011/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking Mandamus to direct revenue authorities to issue an assignment patta for land based on an order and undertaking given by the NHRC, which remained unimplemented. The Court directed the District Collector to dispose of the claim within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

A direction was issued to the District Collector to dispose of the petitioner's claim for grant of assignment patta within twelve weeks of receiving a copy of this judgment.

K.Nadandiammal Vs The National Human Rights — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 18.05.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.9011 of 2015

¶6

K.Nadandhiammal ... Petitioner Vs.

¶7

1 The National Human Rights Commission, Rep. By the Assistant Registrar (Law Division) Faridkot House, Copernicus Marg, New Delhi-110 011. 2. The District Collector, Collectorate of Villupuram, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate of Villupuram, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tindivanam & Taluk, Villupuram District. 5. The Tahsildar, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu. 6. The Revenue Inspector, Rettanai Revenue Firka, Rettanai Village & Post, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

The Firka Surveyor, Rettanai Revenue Firka, Rettanai Village & Post, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶10

The Village Administrative Officer, Rettanai Revenue Village, Rettanai Village & Post, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶11

The Village President, Rettanai Village Panchayat, Rettanai Village & Post, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. Prayer:

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 2 to 8 herein to issue assignment patta to the Tharisu land vide Survey No.211/1 extent about 1.44.5 acres situated in Rettanai West Village, Rettanai Firka, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupura District, as per the order of direction issued by the National Human Rights Commission represented by the Assistant Registrar (Law Division) the 1^st respondent herein dated 31.08.2012 in case No.1017/22/42/2012.

¶14

From the records produced, it is seen that the petitioner has been seeking to grant of assignment patta for the land in question and the Government has also agreed before the National Human Rights Commission to grant patta to the petitioner in accordance with law. Since the undertaking given before the National Human Rights Commission has not been complied with, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition.

¶15

2.The fifth respondent Tahsildar has filed a counter wherein it is stated that there are objections from the village people

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

for issuance of patta to the land in question in favour of the petitioner. It is for the Authority to consider the objections and pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner.

¶18

3.In view of the above, there will be a direction to the District Collector, Villupuram, namely, the second respondent to dispose of the claim of the petitioner for grant of patta in accordance with the order passed by the National Human Rights Commission in accordance with law. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

4.In the result, the writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No order as to costs.

¶20

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kal
To
1 The Assistant Registrar (Law Division)
The National Human Rights Commission,
Faridkot House,
Copernicus Marg,
New Delhi-110 011.
2. The District Collector,
Collectorate of Villupuram,
Villupuram,
Villupuram District.
3. The District Revenue Officer,
Collectorate of Villupuram,
Villupuram,
Villupuram District.
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
O/o. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Tindivanam & Taluk,
Villupuram District.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

The Tahsildar,
Tindivanam Taluk,
Villupuram District,
Tamil Nadu.
6. The Revenue Inspector,
Rettanai Revenue Firka,
Rettanai Village & Post,
Tindivanam Taluk,
Villupuram District.
7. The Firka Surveyor,
Rettanai Revenue Firka,
Rettanai Village & Post,
Tindivanam Taluk,
Villupuram District.
8. The Village Administrative Officer,
Rettanai Revenue Village,
Rettanai Village & Post,
Tindivanam Taluk,
Villupuram District.
9. The Village President,
Rettanai Village Panchayat,
Rettanai Village & Post,
Tindivanam Taluk,
Villupuram District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.37784
+1cc to Mr.Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy, Advocate Sr.37657
W.P.No.9011 of 2015
srg 09/06/2017

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Nadandiammal v. The National Human Rights

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Nadandiammal v. The National Human Rights

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Padmanaban, Vs the Director of Rural

M.Gunasekaran Vs The Commissioner of Municipal

M.Chandrasekaran Vs The State of Tamilnadu

P.Venkattan, Vs the State of Tamilnadu

E.Ezhilarasi, Vs The Secretary to Government

S.Gandhimathi Vs The Director of Adi Dravidar